Due to the frequency of psychological distress associated with online reputation issues, I interviewed a psychologist and referred my reputation clients to him. These things are very expensive for people. I've had customers who were genuinely apprehensive about going out to restaurants because they'd been accosted by people who had read and believed false claims posted online about them. In a completely opposite direction last year, Google announced
That it would accept takedown requests for revenge porn — without even a court order being required. However, a number of revenge porn victims I have helped have had instances of defamatory written statements on various web pages in addition to images fax number list and videos being posted to harm them. So, ironically, Google's current policy change will mean that these victims could theoretically remove their images from search with just a note to Google,
while the associated defamatory written content might not be removed, even with an order from the court. If this new paradigm becomes the status quo, lawyers who are experts in these areas will likely stop helping new clients because there will be no way to reasonably predict positive outcomes and the risk of failure will be too high. If you're vilified on Ripoff Report, which has over two million published reports,